While reading the article on Bhagat I just admired how the rationality element shall elevate a person morally!!! But inspite of my admirations, I also have some questions for Bhagat.
1 though he clearly clarifies about his atheist thinking evolvement as a matter of rationality not as product of pride and vanity, why his definition of theism is too narrow?
2 he clearly questioned the customary practices efficacy by applying reason,
But whether his short life span made him unable to read and understand the fundamental commonalities of all religion?
According to my view, Gandhiji's religion into the politics wanted to serve the society spiritually whereas Bhagat's service to mankind is purely based on rationality the commonality between two is HUMANITY - basic necessity of evolving homosapiens.
No comments:
Post a Comment